For cocoa farmers in the forested region of San Martin, Peru, adapting to new, sustainable farming methods may mean passing through the financial ‘Valley of Death.’
Improved cocoa farming methods can boost yields and reduce negative effects on the environment. For example, by planting the cocoa trees between other native tree species, farmers can improve soil quality and raise yields, which means they are more likely to keep farming the same patch, rather than moving and cutting new swathes of undisturbed rainforest every few years.
It seems like a win-win situation: more profitable, better for the environment. But despite the benefits, farmers struggle to make this transition.
Why? It comes down to investment. Farmers need money to buy new trees and equipment. They will probably also need to learn new farming methods. Funding this is difficult, as most cocoa farmers are smallholders, who can only access expensive short-term loans, which often have interest rates of 24% or above. This means switching to sustainable methods would mean crossing what we call the Valley of Death: several years of high costs and low returns, potentially impossible for the vast majority of cocoa smallholders.
A new piece of analysis from Global Canopy Programme shows how lenders could overcome the Valley of Death by changing the lending conditions for agricultural finance. ‘Conquering the ‘Valley of Death:’ overcoming pitfalls in financing sustainable agriculture’ shows how lower interest rates and longer grace periods (before the loan must be paid back) makes the proposition becomes much more attractive. Indeed, it should be significantly more attractive than borrowing money for traditional agriculture if farmers are to abandon generations-old slash and burn practices.
Such an approach could be extended to many different ‘deforestation risk commodities’, such as soy, coffee or palm oil, which are currently eating into the forest across the tropics. And loans are just one way of financing sustainable agriculture. Many organisations are starting to experiment with innovative mechanisms to make sustainability profitable, detailed in this recent policy briefing.
The cocoa analysis comes from the GCP-led Unlocking Forest Finance project, which has worked in San Martin, Peru, and two regions in Brazil, to build the case for investment in more sustainable forms of land use. Alongside cocoa, the team analysed a wide range of other supply chains and considered the potential to make them more sustainable.
Finally…
…thank you for reading this story. Our mission is to make them freely accessible to everyone, no matter where they are.
We believe that lasting and impactful change starts with changing the way people think. That’s why we amplify the diverse voices the world needs to hear – from local restoration leaders to Indigenous communities and women who lead the way.
By supporting us, not only are you supporting the world’s largest knowledge-led platform devoted to sustainable and inclusive landscapes, but you’re also becoming a vital part of a global community that’s working tirelessly to create a healthier world for us all.
Every donation counts – no matter the amount. Thank you for being a part of our mission.
Want to get the latest climate and environmental stories in your inbox? Sign up here to stay in the loop.
Every week, we’ll send you our top feature story. Discover green innovations, social justice issues, environmental history and more.
Tune into our live monthly podcast with the world’s unsung environmental heroes. Sign up to find out when the next episode drops.
Once a month, get informed with our 5-minute round-up of the latest environmental headlines from around the world.
You've been successfully added to our newsletter list. Stay tuned for the latest climate stories and updates.
In the news: Brazil military surrenders to loggers, banks lend trillions to fossil fuels and how to make greener cryptocurrency investments
News to know in the Landscape News digest
The ancient concept of stewardship brings novel implications for sustainable economic structures.