Octopus farming: Just another extractive industry?

Should we raise these eight-legged creatures for food?

Octopus farming is on the verge of a major breakthrough, with plans now well underway for the world’s first commercial octopus farm in Spain. This development has sparked fierce debate over whether these intelligent creatures should be raised for food.

While advocates say the farms could relieve pressure on wild stocks, scientists and animal rights groups have argued that it is both ethically and environmentally unsound. More generally, it highlights some of the problems of farming carnivorous seafood amid growing calls for more sustainable food.

Polbo á feira
Polbo á feira, a traditional octopus dish in Galicia, Spain. Elle Hughes, Unsplash

Why farm octopus?

Octopus has been eaten across Asia, the Mediterranean and South America for centuries, but annual global demand more than doubled between 1980 and 2019, driven in part by new markets like the U.S. Unlike other popular seafood, all octopus is wild-caught, whether straight to plate or via offshore floating sea cages where juveniles are raised on bycatch.

As demand has grown, so too have prices, but catches have fallen in traditional octopus fishing grounds due to decades of commercial fishing, as well as pressures such as acidification and warming waters.

Those factors have fueled a race for octopus farming, which culminated in 2019 when the Spanish company Nueva Pescanova announced that they had successfully closed “the octopus reproduction cycle in aquaculture” – in other words, they had raised octopuses through every stage of their life cycle.

Advocates of these farms have argued that octopus farming could offer relief to wild octopus populations. But a 2019 study found that aquaculture doesn’t substantially replace caught fish. Instead, it supplements them.

“Our fundamental question with this study was: does fish farming conserve wild fish?” said lead author Stefano Longo at the time. “The answer is: not really.”

As Longo went on to explain, his team discovered that expanding aquaculture could in fact “contribute to greater demand for seafood as a result of the social processes that shape production and consumption.”

To rectify this, Longo says, “aquaculture (and fisheries) could benefit from producing species lower in the food web.”

This brings us to one of the major issues with octopus aquaculture: as ocean predators, they sit high in the food chain.

Octopus in aquarium
An octopus in an aquarium in Barcelona, Spain. Serena Repice Lentini, Unsplash

Food eating food

Like many of the fish we farm, octopuses are carnivorous. As such, they require large quantities of animal-based food to survive and grow in captivity. While exact figures are still hard to come by, it has been suggested that it could take up to three kilograms of feed to produce one kilogram of farmed octopus.

Much of this feed consists of fishmeal, which is manufactured by grinding up small foraging fish such as herring, anchovies and sardines, as well as bycatch and byproducts of the fishing industry.

While proponents argue that this utilizes waste, research has found that around a quarter of the world’s commercially caught fish are directed straight to fishmeal production – even though 90 percent of it is “food grade,” meaning it can be eaten directly by people.

“In general, diverting food that can be eaten by humans to feed animals that subsequently are food for humans is not a good idea,” says Paul van Zwieten, an assistant professor of aquaculture and fisheries at Wageningen University.

“In every step of the food chain, you lose roughly 90 percent of the energy,” meaning even if farmed octopus didn’t require as much feed, “there would still be a loss in energy, nutrients and proteins that we could have utilized.”

Nueva Pescanova, who will operate the planned octopus farm in Spain, have stated that they will transition to more plant-based feed in the future. But even this could divert resources away from people, with crops such as corn, wheat and soy requiring 0.2 to 0.3 hectares of land per ton of feed.

Around a quarter of all commercially caught fish is used to make fishmeal. via Envato

Where are the fish for feed coming from?

The small pelagic fish that make up the bulk of fishmeal are considered relatively stable on a global scale, with fluctuations in specific geographies “balanced out” over the world population. But farming can exacerbate these natural fluctuations and amplify the collapse of forager fish populations, recent research has shown.

Those collapses can have serious implications, as forager fish play a vital role in ocean food webs – transferring energy from plankton to larger marine life such as bigger fish, seabirds and marine mammals. What’s more, these small fish are vital for food and livelihoods in many coastal communities.

In 2021, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) reported that small pelagic fish made up more than two-thirds of catches in northwestern Africa. Sardinella was of particular importance, contributing “significantly to the economy” as well as to the “food and nutrition security of both coastal and inland communities of the region.”

But Sardinella stocks were in decline, and on top of their vulnerability to environmental variations, these fish populations faced additional pressure from the region’s growing fishmeal industry. This could have worrying implications for food and nutrition security.

“In countries like Mauritania, Senegal and the Gambia, fishmeal is almost entirely produced from small pelagics that are usually considered the main and cheaper source of animal protein for thousands of people in the region,” said Djiga Thiao, a fisheries expert and FAO technical lead of a 2020 study into the impacts of the growing fishmeal industry in Sub-Saharan Africa.

That study also noted that while a growing fishmeal industry could offer job opportunities, it risked doing so at the expense of local fish processors and traders, particularly women.

It’s a similar story in South Africa, where “all of the anchovy landings from large-scale fisheries are reduced to animal feed, fish oil and pet food,” according to a 2016 study. Likewise, in Kenya, the same study found that 84 percent of fished dagaa was used for fishmeal.

And it’s not just Africa, either: Peru and Chile have the world’s largest anchoveta fisheries, but while these small oily fish were once commonly consumed by people in the region, they’re now sent off for fishmeal.

Drying octopus
Wild-caught octopus being dried under the sun in Paros, Greece. Fabien Bazanegue, Unsplash

Another extractive food system?

It’s unlikely that farmed octopus will end up on plates in the countries producing the fishmeal to support the nascent industry. Instead, these aquatic resources are often being taken from communities in the Global South to feed the appetites of the Global North.

It remains to be seen how octopus farming will impact demand for fishmeal and the communities that produce it. But without even touching on the significant ethical and environmental issues surrounding octopus farming, there are clearly many social considerations to weigh up, too.



…thank you for reading this story. Our mission is to make them freely accessible to everyone, no matter where they are. 

We believe that lasting and impactful change starts with changing the way people think. That’s why we amplify the diverse voices the world needs to hear – from local restoration leaders to Indigenous communities and women who lead the way.

By supporting us, not only are you supporting the world’s largest knowledge-led platform devoted to sustainable and inclusive landscapes, but you’re also becoming a vital part of a global movement that’s working tirelessly to create a healthier world for us all.

Every donation counts – no matter the amount. Thank you for being a part of our mission.

Sidebar Publication

Related articles

Related articles